Hypothetical Mean

Commentary from an Actuarial and Economic Perspective

Born in the USA

with one comment

There was no room at the inn.  Or anywhere in Canada.  Therefore, Karen Jepp’s rare, identical quadruplets were born at Benefis Hospital in Great Falls, Montana, USA.  For those counting, Calgary is Canada‘s third largest city. Great Falls is Montana‘s third largest metropolis.

How could an entire national system not have enough spare capacity for four simultaneous neonatal cases? A clue is provided by the Calgary Herald (linked above):

The Calgary Health Region is picking up the tab for the babies’ U.S. health care — from $1,500 to $2,000 a day for the mother, Karen, and from $6,000 to $7,000 a day for each of the four girl’s stay in intensive care. Had Karen delivered in Calgary, her care would have cost $800 a day, and it would have been $2,500 a day for the quads.

We have more spare capacity (note that this was the 5th time this year Calgary has run short on neonatal space). But we have this capacity because we pay for it.

Should a rural town of 56,000 have a world-class neonatal facility to deliver rare quadruplets? Who should decide? The political system?

In Canada, mothers like Karen are supported by the The Twins, Triplets and More Association of Calgary. The TTMAC is arguing that Calgary’s health system must expand swiftly, and officials agreed. They plan to expand to 18 beds in September (from 16). By early next year, they hope to have 21. I guess that kind of works … as long as the good folk in Great Falls are around.

Also see … SamwickGreat Falls Tribune editorial

UPDATE (8/21): The Charleston Daily Mail has an editorial that clarifies the bed situation. Benefis in Great Falls, MT, has 20 neonatal beds, 25% more capacity than Calgary, and only one less than the proposed Calgary expansion. This is in spite of a 20-1 population difference in the communities (although Benefis also services most of Montana and, apparently, portions of Canada). Women and Children’s Hospital in Charleston (pop. 50,000) has 26 such beds. There appears to be a stark supply difference between the two systems.

Advertisements

Written by Victor

August 21, 2007 at 2:18 am

One Response

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Actually, I think we have this capacity because so many people can’t afford to get sick, they just stay out of the hospital. But hey, what would I know. I haven’t had consistent coverage since 1999…

    Dana

    August 21, 2007 at 5:16 am


Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: